listen to fbi subpoena hearing recording on redacted email

LISTEN TO FBI SUBPOENA HEARING RECORDING ON REDACTED EMAIL CODE

Attorney for the District of Columbia that Flynn’s underlying conduct in 20 was unobjectionable and that therefore there wasn’t a “legitimate” basis for the FBI to be investigating Flynn’s secret communications with the Russian Ambassador at all, even though Russia had just completed an elaborate effort to manipulate the American electoral process in order to help elect Donald Trump. Most importantly, as I’ll explain, what’s most alarming and troubling about the DOJ brief itself is not that it asks the court for leave to dismiss the charge against Flynn, but that it depends upon the rather shocking view of the Attorney General and the Acting U.S.

LISTEN TO FBI SUBPOENA HEARING RECORDING ON REDACTED EMAIL CODE

criminal code is diverting attention from where it ought to be, on much more significant matters of constitutional governance. Unfortunately, just as with the public’s anticipation of and reaction to the Mueller investigation, the inordinate focus on whether a particular individual committed one or another offense under the U.S. Many other actors, by contrast, have acted appropriately and in the national interest. In the course of the Flynn “affair,” however, several officials-including but hardly limited to Flynn himself-have done far more disturbing and damaging things. Whatever the right answer might be as to whether Judge Sullivan should or shouldn’t grant the motion to dismiss the charge against Flynn, the principal purpose of this article is to stress the relative insignificance of that question in the grander scheme of things.įlynn’s lies to the FBI in his Januinterview were indefensible. But that’s not the primary reason I’m writing. Īt the end of this article, I’ll offer a few thoughts about the merits of DOJ’s submission and about the options Judge Sullivan has for dealing with it. Circuit panel (Judges Henderson, Wilkins and Rao) has ordered Judge Sullivan himself to file a response addressing that request by next Monday, June 1. Circuit, asking that court to order Judge Sullivan to “immediately” grant DOJ’s motion to dismiss. In the meantime, Flynn himself has filed a writ of mandamus in the U.S. Judge Sullivan is scheduled to hear argument on DOJ’s motion to dismiss on July 16. All that remains of the case before judgment is entered against Flynn is for the judge to impose a sentence.

Flynn pleaded guilty-twice-for knowingly and willfully making materially false statements to the FBI in a Januinterview, in violation of 18 U.S.C. There’s been a great deal of discussion over the past couple of weeks about whether Judge Emmet Sullivan should, must, or cannot grant the Department of Justice’s recent motion to dismiss the single-count criminal information against Michael Flynn.

Listen to fbi subpoena hearing recording on redacted email